Tonight December 18th 2005 we have our second honeree.
Wendy’s
6040 Zebulon Rd
Macon, GA 31210
This store is giving the Krystal across the street a run for their money in the stingy fries department.
I ordered a triple cheese and asked for it to be “biggie sized with the largest fry and drink you have”.
Click here if you want to see what I actually got.
As noted below the New York Times has a policy with clear channels for citizens to comment about potential inaccuracies.
From the New York Times websites corrections page.
The Times welcomes comments and suggestions, or complaints about errors that warrant correction. Messages on news coverage can be e-mailed to nytnews@nytimes.com or left toll-free at 1-888-NYT-NEWS (1-888-698-6397). Comments on editorials may be e-mailed to letters@nytimes.com or faxed to (212) 556-3622.
Readers dissatisfied with a response or concerned about the paper’s journalistic integrity may reach the public editor, Byron Calame, at public@nytimes.com or (212) 556-7652.
For newspaper delivery questions: 1-800-NYTIMES (1-800-698-4637).
Unfortunately it seems that neither The Macon Telegraph nor Knight Ridder intend to address the issues I have raised. Even if they disagree and decide that no correction is warranted; stonewalling and ignoring the allegation is not the proper response. The key here is that the Telegraph and Mr. Richardson owe me and their readers a response.
So far I have emailed my concerns to:
letters@macontel.com
smarshall@macontel.com
adalton@knightridder.com
lschlatter@knightridder.com
plaffoon@knightridder.com
Not one has responded in any way.
I know they have received the emails I have sent since they published my letter October 21st indicating my belief that the Federal reporter shield law should be rejected by congress.
Tuesday, October 18, 2005
The Angry Citizen
It has become obvious that neither the Macon Telegraph nor Knight Ridder will correct Mr. Richardson’s dishonest and irresponsible repeating of rumors and outright lies.
The Telegraph and Knight Ridder apparently have less integrity than the New York Times.
Read the rest of this entry »